or help with writing to the journal, you may find this handbook useful: How to communicate with the journal? By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. I am at the same stage. availability to assess the manuscript within the requested time. Decisions are quicker, and editorial criteria can be made uniform across disciplines. Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in consultation with editors handling submissions in related fields when necessary. After the Editor in Chief assigns the manuscript to an editor, the next task is "waiting for reviewer assignment" by that assigned editor. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. This enables most queries to be resolved before proof stage. volume5,page 917 (2002)Cite this article. Dealing With a Negative Editorial Decision. Nat Neurosci 5, 917 (2002). Authors are usually informed within a week if the paper is not being considered. March 1, 2023 - As we approach, on March 14, its 12-year anniversary, now is as good a time as any to reflect on Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Rule 206 (4)-5 (the "Pay-to-Play Rule . This, in turn, means that the status Awaiting decision refers to the decision that the editor will take about whether your paper will be sent for peer review or desk rejected. At this point, you realize you've reached the end of the email, thus eliminating the possibility that some subsequent paragraph will say, "However, today is Opposite Day.". This decision will then be validated by the Editor-in-Chief. Usually, the times vary from two to six months, but there is no fixed rule. When facing rejection, many of us don't even know that there is a formal process of appealing the decision. This will reduce delays. The Decision Started status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journals editorial board is in the process of making a decision. #AcademicChatter" Their role is to. [CDATA[// > Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Read the entire letter, including all of the reviewers comments and the editors explanations (if any). Hope that helps. My thesis aimed to study dynamic agrivoltaic systems, in my case in arboriculture. If you receive a revise and resubmit it may take another 24 months to hear back on the revised article. Production Short answer: the editor will continue to try and find other suitable reviewers, sending them invitations and waiting for replies. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles The categories includeroughly in order of persuasivenessnew data or analysis, factual errors by referees or editors, disagreement with technical criticisms, evidence of referee bias, procedural concerns and disputes over novelty or significance. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. All Articles published in Nature go through at least one round of review, usually two or three, sometimes more. Do the revisions and resubmit. After going through the reviewers comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. Either rejection or sending it out for review. Yes Editorial processes are described for the following stages: Atsubmission | Aftersubmission | Afteracceptance. Make sure that your arguments are backed by solid evidence. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in ]]> Cactus Communications. How long should we wait if the current status of the manuscript is "Decision Started"? Authors subsequently receive an e-proof, including the figures, and can also download a PDF proof of the layout. Could you please shed some light on the outcome of your situation? [CDATA[> In all these cases, it is likely that some time will elapse before Nature can respond, and the paper must not be submitted for publication elsewhere during this time. A final decision of acceptance or rejection of the revised manuscript is made by the editors as soon as they conclude that they have sufficient information at hand for doing so. Peer review comments, cover letter and more. Calm down, and wait a few days before starting your response, then re-read the version of the paper that you actually submitted. The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Not only do you need to try your luck at another journal, you also receive preciously little advice how to improve your chances. If an author wishes to appeal against Nature's decision, the appeal must be made in writing, not by telephone, and should be confined to the scientific case for publication. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? However, if it has not gone through peer review, but is directly showing the status awaiting final decision, then there is a possibility that your paper might be rejected after initial screening by the editor. Journalists have embargoedaccess to papers via the Nature Research press site, and are permitted to show papers to independent specialists a few days in advance of publication, under embargo conditions, solely for the purpose of eliciting comment on the work described. We understand your anxiety :-) However, the. Nature's subeditors are happy to advise authors about the format of their Articles after acceptance for publication. After a paper is accepted, it is subedited (copyedited) to ensure maximum clarity and reach, a process that enhances the value of papers in various ways. A group of my colleagues recently discussed scheduling about 25,000 words to 35,000 words per week for a typical edit, if there even is such a thing. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. 9.3 weeks. At times, they may ask you to revise and resubmit the manuscript. Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. In addition, most authors are genuinely excited about their work, and usually submit to Nature Neuroscience because they believe that the paper deserves high-profile publication. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in I submitted a MS to a Nature-Branded Journal on 9/10 and today the status changed to "Editor Decision Started". response letterresubmit, 3. How did it go for you after this? The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. Should I write to the editor or wait for a response/change in status? round 1""nature nature metabolism. any technical failings that need to be addressed before the authors' case is established. Figures for recent years (original research only) are shown in the table below: Nature does not employ an editorial board of senior scientists, nor is it affiliated to a scientific society or institution, thus its decisions are independent, unbiased by scientific or national prejudices of particular individuals.